• Share on Google+

YouTube launched its new interface today.  And, shock-horror – it has ditched user ratings, a core component of social media and social commerce. You can ‘heart’ stuff and you can ‘bury’ stuff – but you can no longer rate stuff.

The death of ratings on YouTube is important for social commerce because YouTube is the poster-child social media platform – soon to be upgraded to a social commerce platform (as it rolls out charging for premium content), which means that where YouTube goes, others will follow.

Why get rid of user ratings (BTW YouTube has also ditched the ‘Broadcast Yourself’ social media rallying tagline, so is this an anti-democratic conspiracy?)?

Simple: User ratings are useless – according to YouTube.  Most people only bother to rate stuff they like which means average ratings are all good. A fact that is backed up  by social commerce software providers like Bazaarvoice and PowerReviews – (the average is 4.3 stars out of five, if I remember correctly from Bazaarvoice’s social commerce webinar yesterday).  Good for retailers looking to shift stock – but pointless for users looking to separate the flotsam from the funky. For discovery and selection, it’s easier just to to look at ‘view volume’ or ‘favourite volume’ – which is presumably why YouTube has also bumped up the size of view numbers significantly.

User Ratings on YouTube (from Techcrunch)

Psychologically, it’s far less taxing on the brain to give feedback in simple binary like/dislike form, and binary feedback is arguably easier to turn into a useful format to inform choices.  And culturally, binary feedback is less open to cultural bias, as anyone who has done a balanced score card review will know. Americans over rate, German’s under rate.

So on balance, we think ditching ratings may be the shape of things to come in social commerce, leave ratings to professional reviewers – it’s what they’re trained to do, and let users vote (on features as well as products/services).  It works for democracy, surely it can work for social commerce?

YouTube's New Streamlined 2010 Look

  • Reply
    Author
    Sam Decker

    Interesting post. Not sure I agree with the sentiment that users shouldn’t be rating things, or that ratings are useless. It’s a bit of throwing the baby out with the bathwater. The context of the situation, the audience, the product or service, registration system, display, volume, etc. all play into the effectivness of the rating/review system. Ratings is what pull people in, however I will tell you that 80% of shoppers get more decision-making value out of a review vs. the rating (Bazaarvoice study). I talked about this topic here: http://chiefmarketer.com/disciplines/online/1006-product-reviews/

    • Reply
      Author
      Paul Marsden

      Thanks Sam, appreciate the comment, link and well-advised caution – I really agree with you that user ratings can make sense in the context of a review (point two in your article).

      Similar debates are happening in customer experience research circles as well (e.g. 11 point Net Promoter Rating Scale vs. a simple binary ‘would you recommend it’ (Yes/No) question – which I am a fan of).

      So I don’t want to appear negative about ratings, especially professional ratings (whilst I’d be happy with my friend telling me if a film was good or not (binary), I’d really value a professional movie critic telling me just how good it was). I simply think there may be method to YouTube’s madness; from a research perspective, binary questions may be sometimes easier to answer, and may have more research validity and reliability – so better for informing choices. They are definitely a LOT easier to analyse;-). But will the death of ratings on YouTube be the catalyst their general demise? I certainly don’t think – or hope – so.

  • Reply
    Author
    Tweets that mention YouTube & The Death of User Ratings | Social Commerce Today — Topsy.com

    […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Paul Marsden, Manuel Ressel. Manuel Ressel said: YouTube & The Death of User Ratings http://bit.ly/4rHig8 […]

  • Reply
    Author
    kingdom Protoctista

    Superb, what a web site it is! This webpage gives valuable information to us,
    keep it up.

  • Reply
    Author
    family Campanulaceae

    It’s very trouble-free to find out any matter on
    net as compared to textbooks, as I found this paragraph at this site.

  • Reply
    Author
    http://www.iheartteachers.org

    The main difference is more in the vocabulary. Needless to say,
    it waited before very end-of the presentation to expose the newest iPad.
    Insist on buying the iPad in this condition only.

  • Reply
    Author
    installous alternatives for ios 7

    The best component about this application is that it is totally free,
    sure, I stated Free!
    For these they enjoy quickpwn but here is a GUI, there is definitely a
    solitary now.

  • Reply
    Author
    .txt

    He probado el plan de mi mismo, y me quedé muy statisfied con mis resultados .
    La utilización de almacenamiento en la nube exige que tiene conectividad con el servidor.
    Al usarlo, usted puede tocar la batería en su dispositivo móvil .

  • Reply
    Author
    blogspot.ru

    Once this is finished tap Return to Cydia. By this stage, we have proven that solitary-zero roulette
    is the much more beneficial variation to play.
    The object of the sport is to find words by connecting letters in a grid.

  • Reply
    Author
    Howto Install And Receive Cydia In Your Apple Device

    This really is where you will require fingerboard.
    fingerboard is just a free app and it may be within Lydia.

  • Reply
    Author
    Russell

    You have sat and spoke for a while, when the conversation turns to sex.
    The strip dancer usually takes several measures to turn you on, but you should never touch her.
    Even going to the seashore could be a battle.