Infographic | Social Media Timeline (and Amazon invests $175m in LivingSocial)

So yesterday Amazon invested $175 million (WSJ) in group-buy social commerce platform LivingSocial, putting other social commerce investor news  – $6m for f-commerce storefront software Payvment, and $5m for “eBay of Facebook” Yardsellr – into the shadows.

We’re not quite in bubblicious AOL TimeWarner territory yet, but whilst we’re waiting to see if 2010 climaxes with an almighty big social commerce bang – Google gobbling up group-buy giant Groupon for $6bn – twice the amount it paid for DoubleClick (think of Gmail as Groupon Mail (193m users) and you’ll start to see why it might make sense), here’s a superb infographic from the Skloog blog – the social media timeline…  From little acorns and all that.

Will the social commerce bubble pop? Some social commerce platforms will inevitably be destined for the dead pool like some of the hitherto heavyweights in the chart. Who will be the MySpace of the social commerce space?  Mean game, but fun. (click to enlarge the chart – it is huge, like social commerce right now).

Previous Speed Summaries | New Social Commerce Presentations from PayPal and Skive
Next The Future of Social Commerce: Customisation, Curation, Personalisation


  1. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Paul Marsden, Adhiyanto Goen and akvederis, SysIQ Inc. SysIQ Inc said: Infographic | Social Media Timeline (and Amazon invests $175m in LivingSocial) […]

  2. December 5, 2010

    Obviously guys like Google can afford to buy anything that moves. But I can’t help thinking that these social commerce platforms they are snapping up will prove their value – we are edging closer to demonstrating how social media generates business revenue.

  3. December 6, 2010

    Hi Paul,

    the latest news seems to suggest Google hasn’t bought Groupon – which makes this Amazon move interesting, if they knew this, then it might be a defensive more from Amazon to stop Google moving to the next most attractive option. I guess they’re also trying to cover the bases having bought Woot back in the summer.

    However, perhaps the most interesting thing to come out of all of this is the news from ATD that Groupon’s revenues for this year might be as high as $2bn which suggests that the Google price wasn’t that overinflated as many commentators suggested, and that the market might not be a bubble.

  4. Sean
    December 6, 2010

    Can any shed some light on why Amazon would invest such a large amount rather than buying the company? Does the investment help Amazon stockholders in any way?


    • December 7, 2010

      Hello Sean, thanks for the comment, interesting question. Perhaps Amazon is more keen on generating social commerce insight that would come from being an investor – without the hassles of ownership/integration? That, and given the dizzying valuations of group-buy sites now, maybe it’s smarter to have an option on future purchase than full ownership…

  5. December 7, 2010

    O.K. so now Mashable is saying that Groupon will turnover £800 million this year. This seems a more sensible figure. Still, I think it suggests why the owners were able to say no to Google.

  6. […] Fonte: Social Commerce Today […]

  7. […] Fonte: Social Commerce Today […]

  8. […] the most popular group-buy deal ever award, at least, netting over 1m transactions.  Last month, Amazon invested $175m in LivingSocial, and yesterday the two celebrated the union, with a $10 for a $20 Amazon voucher deal, which runs […]

  9. […] Posted on January 28, 2011 by Paul Marsden Posted in Latest, Market News, f-commerce TweetSo Amazon has bought a chunk of group-buy platform LivingSocial, eBay is trialling a group-buy Groupon clone […]

  10. […] Which is why, pima facie, it might seem odd that Walmart gobbled up Kosmix, rather than followed in Amazon’s $175m footsteps and take a bite out of a group-buy platform. Of course, if Walmart’s social commerce push […]

  11. […] History of Social Media – History of Social […]

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *